“WHAT IS TASAWWUF (SUFISM)?”
By A. A. Godlas
What is Tasawwuf?
What is Tasawwuf? Good character and awareness of God.
That’s all Tasawwuf is. And nothing more.
What is Tasawwuf? Love and affection.
It is the cure for hatred and vengeance. And nothing more.
What is Tasawwuf? The heart attaining tranquility–
which is the root of religion. And nothing more.
What is Tasawwuf? Concentrating your mind,
which is the religion of Ahmad (pbuh).
And nothing more.
What is Tasawwuf? Contemplation that travels to the Divine
throne.
It is a far-seeing gaze. And nothing more.
Tasawwuf is keeping one’s distance from imagination
and supposition.
Tasawwuf is found in certainty. And nothing more.
Surrendering one’s soul to the care of the inviolability
of religion;
this is Tasawwuf. And nothing more.
Tasawwuf is the path of faith and affirmation of unity;
this is the incorruptible religion. And nothing more.
Tasawwuf is the smooth and illuminated path.
It is the way to the most exalted paradise. And nothing more.
I have heard that the ecstasy of the wearers of wool
comes from finding the taste of religion. And nothing more.
Tasawwuf is nothing but shari’at.
It is just this clear road. And nothing more.
An Anonymous Persian Poem –
Translated by A. A. Godlas
A Commentary on “What Is Tasawwuf?”
By directly addressing the nature of Tasawwuf, this anonymous
Persian poem, “What is Tasawwuf?” contains a number
of essential concepts that are helpful in gaining an understanding
of Tasawwuf. Direct statements about the nature of Tasawwuf
(also known as Sufism) are an important aspect of Sufi literature.
The renowned scholar Abu Nu‘aym al-Asbahani (Isfahani)
(d. 430/1038) included one-hundred and thirty-four such assertions
(often in rhymed prose) in his encyclopaedic biographical
collection, the Hilyat al-awliya’. The great
English scholar of Sufism, Nicholson, collected and translated
seventy-eight of these sayings. Most recently, Tamar Frank
has devoted an article to studying Abu Nu‘aym’s
sayings of this kind. The poem that is the object of this
study, in answering the question “What is Tasawwuf?”
makes a number of pithy assertions about the central concepts
of Tasawwuf by means of its technical vocabulary. Consequently,
in this article we have sought to explain those concepts that
may not be obvious even to the educated reader. In explaining
these terms, we have relied mainly upon authoritative Islamic
sources such as the Qur’an, hadith, and highly regarded
Sufi authors.
Good character (akhlaq)
The word akhlaq, translated here as “good
character,” is at best an inexact translation denoting
virtuous behaviour that is an outgrowth of spiritual refinement.
Hujwiri (d. ca. 465/1072), informed us that Abu al-Hasan al-Nuri
(d. 295/907-8) stated, “Tasawwuf is not composed of
practices (rusum) and sciences (‘ulum),
but it is akhlaq.” Hujwiri explained that what
Nuri meant was that akhlaq should not be thought
of as simply good comportment or good character in an ordinary
sense. Akhlaq as used by Sufis consists of virtuous
behaviour that derives from the fact that the inner being
of the Sufi has become cleansed and his or her heart has become
purified. How such a Sufi behaves, then, is not so much the
product of effort as it is the cresting of a wave, the origins
of which is God. Hujwiri, in explaining Nuri’s remark
went on to say,
If it [Tasawwuf] consisted of practices, it could be acquired
by effort (mujahadat), and if it consisted of sciences,
it could be gained by instruction (ta’allum);
but it is akhlaq and it is not acquired until you
demand from yourself the requirements (hukm) of
akhlaq, conform your actions to them, and do justice
to them. The distinction between practices (rusum)
and akhlaq is this, that practices are contrived
(bi-takalluf) actions proceeding from particular
motives (asbab), such that their “outer form”
(zahir) is at variance with their “inner
truth” (batin); they are actions devoid of
essence (ma’na). Akhlaq, on the
other hand, are non-contrived praiseworthy actions not proceeding
from particular motives. Their outer form is in harmony
with their inner truth; they are actions devoid of pretension.
Awareness of God (ihsan)
The phrase “awareness of God,” is my translation
of the word ihsan, which literally means “doing
what is beautiful.” I have rendered it as “awareness
of God” in view of the sound hadith in which the angel
Gabriel asked the Prophet (pbuh), “What
is ihsan?” He replied, “Ihsan
is that you should worship God as if you see Him; and if you
do not see Him, [you should know that] He sees you.”
The concept of ihsan, with particular attention to
its Qur’anic roots, occupies an entire chapter in what
is arguably the best book in English on basic Islamic concepts,
Murata and Chittick’s Vision of Islam.
The first Sufi to compose a compendium on Tasawwuf, Sarraj
(d. 378/988-89), linked ihsan to “vigilant
awareness” (muraqaba). He stated, “Vigilant
awareness is for a servant who indeed knows and is certain
that Allah is aware of and knows what is in his heart (qalb)
and consciousness (damir). So he stays vigilantly
aware of despicable thoughts that [would otherwise] preoccupy
the heart and keep it from remembering his Master. Qushayri
(d. 465/1072), like Sarraj, saw ihsan to be related
to “vigilant awareness” (muraqaba). Specifically,
he referred to the aspect of ihsan mentioned in the
part of the hadith, “If you do not see him [know] that
indeed he sees you” as alluding to “vigilant awareness”
because “vigilant awareness” “is the servant’s
knowledge of the Lord’s constant awareness of him.”
Love (‘ishq)
The lexicographer Jawhari (d. 453/1061), a contemporary of
Qushayri defined ‘ishq, literally, as “being
excessive in love (al-hubb). While the Qur‘an
speaks of love using a variety of words, it does not use the
word ‘ishq or any words derived from it. Nevertheless,
we do find a derivative of ‘ishq being used
in the hadith. Ghazali (d. 505/1111) noted a hadith in which
the Prophet (pbuh) spoke of “intense
love” (‘ishq): The Messenger of God (pbuh)
stated, “Whoever feels intense love, is virtuous, keeps
his love hidden, and then dies, he will indeed die as a martyr.”
In a strikingly ecstatic passage in his Alchemy of Happiness
(Kimiya-yi sa‘adat), al-Ghazali considers ‘ishq
as that which arises in the fourth and final stage of practicing
the remembrance of God (dhikr). This fourth stage
occurs when
the object of the remembrance dominates the heart (and
that object is God-Haqq – not the remembrance)….
This is the result of one-pointed love (mahabbat-i mufrad),
which is called “intense love” (‘ishq).
The heart of the lover who is burning with love (‘ashiq-i
garmraw) is always with the Beloved (ma’shuq).
It might even occur that on account of the intense degree
of preoccupation of the heart with the Beloved, the name
of the Beloved may be forgotten. When one becomes so drowned
and forgets one’s self and everything – except
God (Haqq) –one reaches the beginning of the path
of Tasawwuf. Sufis call this condition “passing away”
(fana’) and “not existing” (nisti);
meaning that as a result of the remembrance of God, everything
has become non-existent; and such a person also has become
non-existent, namely the one who has forgotten his or her
self.
Mawlana Rumi (d. 672/1273), in his collection of ecstatic
poetry, the Divan-i Shams-i Tabrizi, exclaims in
praise,
This love is so fine, this love that we have is so fine,
O God!
So exquisite, so good, and so beautiful, O God!
Zihi ‘ishq zihi ‘ishq, kah ma rast khudaya,
Chi naghz ast u chi khub ast chi zibast khudaya.
While Divine Love might appear to some to be completely distinct
from human love, for many Sufis such as Ahmad al-Ghazali (d.
520/1126), Ruzbihan (d. 606/1209), Ibn ‘Arabi (d. 638/1240),
Rumi, and ‘Iraqi (d. 688/1289), there was a continuum
from human love to Divine love that the aspiring lover of
God could follow. By learning how to love through love of
a person, the sincere Sufi could – in principle –
transform his or her love of a person into love of Allah.
The contemporary scholars Chittick and Wilson, in the introduction
to their translation of ‘Iraqi’s Lama’at,
discussed this relationship of human love and Divine love.
Speaking of ‘Iraqi’s understanding of love, they
stated, “There is no irreducible dichotomy between divine
and human love…There is a gradation from the love of
forms, which is “apparent love” (‘ishq-i
majazi) to the love of God, which alone is ‘real
love’ (‘ishq-i haqiqi). The lower form
of love can be, and for the Sufi is, the ladder to Divine
Love.”
Affection (mahabba)
The word mahabba is derived from the word hubb,
both of which commonly mean love and affection. In the Qur’an,
both words occur, although hubb is more common. The
verbal form of these words, however, is used numerous times
in the Qur’an. Two ayas involving love that
Sufis frequently quote are “God will bring a people
whom He loves and who love Him” [Q 5:54], and “Say,
if you love God, follow me [namely, the Prophet (pbuh)];
God will love you” [Q 3:31]. A hadith qudsi in which
mahabba is mentioned was included in the highly regarded
Muwatta of Imam Malik (d. 179/795) on the authority of Abu
Idris al-Khawlani (d. 80/699-700). He transmitted the following
narrative, which contains this hadith qudsi as transmitted
by Mu’adh ibn Jabal (d. 18/639):
“Indeed, I heard the Messenger of God (pbuh)
saying, ‘God said, “My love (mahabbati)
necessarily belongs to those who love one another (mutahabbina)
for My sake, sit together for My sake, visit one another
for My sake, and give generously to one another for My sake.”’
”
From the Qur’anic examples that we have cited, in addition
to this hadith, it should be clear that mahabba (affection
and love) is an important Islamic principle. In Sufi literature,
along with an emphasis on the terms ‘ishq (passionate
love), we also often see the terms hubb and mahabba
(affectionate love).
The Heart Attaining Tranquility (itminan-i qalb)
On six occasions the Qur’an links together the roots
of the words itminan and qalb. In particular,
one aya that is frequently cited by Sufis is in surat
al-Ra’d, “Know that hearts find peace through
the remembrance of God” [Q 13:28]. The emphasis in Tasawwuf
on the practice of the remembrance of God is directly linked
with the Qur’anic assertion that hearts become tranquil
and find peace by means of remembering and meditating on God.
A certain shaykh quoted in the Qur’anic commentaries
of Sulami and Ruzbihan said, “Hearts find peace in it
[the remembrance of God], because they did not find other
than God to be a place for intimacy (uns) and comfort
(raha).” Another shaykh quoted by both Sulami
and Baqli stated, “The hearts of the folk of gnosis
only find peace through God and only are tranquil through
Him, because their hearts are the place where He looks (mahal
nazarihi). Thus, Sufis, as lovers of God, only find peace
in their hearts through God and the remembrance of God.
Concentrating Your Mind (jam’-i khatir)
The Sufi technical term jam’ that I have translated
by the word “concentration” is more literally
translated as “the state of being gathered” or
“collected,” sometimes even being rendered as
“union.” It is often used in contrast to the term
tafriqa (separation). Concerning them Qushayri wrote,
“Affirming created existence (khalq) comes
about through ‘separation;’ and affirming God
(Haqq) derives from ‘concentration’ or ‘gatheredness’.
The servant must have both ‘concentration’ and
‘separation.’ Whoever has no ‘separation’
has no servanthood; and whoever has no ‘concentration,’
has no gnosis (ma’rifa).’” Thus
“concentrating one’s mind,” as we find in
the poem, is more than simply the kind of concentration that
one uses in one’s day to day activities in the world.
“Concentrating one’s mind” for the folk
of Tasawwuf implies the transcendental knowledge of God that
is called gnosis (ma’rifa).
The Religion of Ahmad (din-i Ahmad) (pbuh)
The religion of Ahmad (pbuh) is none
other than Islam, since Ahmad (pbuh)
is one of the names of the Prophet (pbuh),
as confirmed in both the Qur’an and hadith. In surat
al-Saff we read, “…Jesus, the son of Mary, said:
O children of Israel, Indeed I am the messenger of God sent
to you to confirm the truth of what is present of the Torah
and to convey to you glad tidings of a Divine messenger who
will come after me, whose name is Ahmad” [Q 61:6]. Both
Bukhari and Muslim, in their authoritative collections of
hadith, reported that the Prophet (pbuh)
stated, “I am Muhammad and I am Ahmad; and I am the
effacer (mahi) who effaces disbelief. And I am the
gatherer (hashir), who will gather people behind
me [on the day of resurrection]; and I am the final one (‘aqib)
[after whom there will be no other prophets].
Contemplation (fikr)
Contemplation (fikr or tafakkur) is an
important aspect of the methodology of Islam in general and
Tasawwuf in particular. In both the Qur‘an and the sunna,
people are instructed by God to contemplate. In surat
al-Nahl, God states, “And we have revealed to you this
[revelation as a] reminder (al-dhikr), so you will
make clear for humankind what has been revealed to them and
so that they will contemplate [Q 16:44]. Similarly, in surat
Al ‘Imran, we read, “Indeed, in the creation of
the heavens and the earth, and in the succession of night
and day, there are indeed signs for all who possess [awakened]
hearts, those who remember Allah when they stand, sit, and
lie down and contemplate the creation of the heavens and the
earth” [Q 3:190-91]. One hadith that clearly expresses
the significance of contemplation in the sunna was cited by
Ghazali, “An hour’s worth of contemplation is
better than a year’s worth of worship.” Contemplation
is so important in the Qur’an, sunna, and Tasawwuf that
Ghazali devoted an entire “book” (kitab)
in his Revival of the Religious Sciences to it.
Certainty (yaqin)
The classical Sufi doctrine of certainty involved three degrees:
the knowledge of certainty (‘ilm al-yaqin),
the eye of certainty (‘ayn al-yaqin), and the
reality of certainty (haqq al-yaqin). Hujwiri (d.
ca. 465/1072) discussed them in the following manner:
“By ‘ilm al-yaqin the Sufis mean
knowledge of (religious) practice (mu’amalat)
in this world according to the Divine commandments; by ‘ayn
al-yaqin they mean knowledge of the state of dying
(naz’) and the time of departure from this
world; and by haqq al-yaqin they mean the unveiling
(kashf) of the vision (of God) that will be revealed
in Paradise, and of its nature. Therefore, ‘ilm
al-yaqin is the rank of religious scholars (‘ulama’)
on account of their correct observance of the divine commands,
and ‘ayn al-yaqin is the station of gnostics
(maqam-i ‘arifan) on account of their readiness
for death, and haqq al-yaqin is the annihilation-point
of lovers (fana’gah-i dustan), on account
of their rejection of all ‘existent beings and things’
(mawjudat)”
In these three degrees of certainty, one clearly sees a hierarchy
of states of consciousness, one which corresponds to a three-fold
hierarchy of human identity: the scholars, the gnostics, and
at the highest degree, the lovers.
According to a later Sufi, Najm al-Din Razi (d. 654/1256),
“certainty” arises when one strives to become
aware of the spiritual world, while living in accordance with
shari’a. If one simply tries to use one’s rational
mind, one will fall into mere philosophy and unbelief. The
key to certainty is the practice of shari’a, which leads
to the awareness that everything is a manifestation of an
attribute of God. In the following passage, Razi discusses
the nature of certainty:
But [in contrast to the mere philosopher and the heretic]
…the possessor of true felicity nourish[es] the seed
of the spirit in accordance with the law of Shari’at
until all his senses attain perfection. He will then perceive,
through his outer and inner senses, all the three hundred
and sixty thousand realms that constitute the material and
spiritual worlds (mulk va malakut)…He sees
every atom in each of these worlds to be a manifestation
of one of the divine attributes containing within it one
of God’s signs; he removes the veil from the face
of the manifestations, and the beauty of God’s signs
is displayed to him. [As the poet Abu al-‘Atahiya
stated,]
In every thing is a sign (aya) of His
pointing to the fact that He is One (ahad).
This is the threshold of the world of certainty (iqan)…Then
the pure essence of God may be known in its unity, and the
attributes (sifat) of divinity may be contemplated
with the eye of certainty (‘ayn al-yaqin).”
Razi makes it very clear: in order to follow the path that
leads to certainty and the awareness of the very “essence
of God,” one must discipline and perfect one’s
senses by means of shari’a, and one must be aware that
there is nothing in existence that does not derive from an
attribute of God.
The Most Exalted Paradise (khuld-i barin)
Khuld is one of the many terms in Islamic languages
for paradise, which can be spoken of as consisting of various
degrees. The highest degree of paradise is sometimes referred
to as khuld-i barin. Some writers of Sufi literature
– such as the author of the poem about which we are
remarking – have seen Tasawwuf as a path to the highest
degree of paradise, a path that is more certain than that
offered by Islam in general, since Tasawwuf is more demanding
and rigorous, going beyond the minimum degree of conformity
to God’s will required in Islam. Other Sufi writers
have used terms for paradise as metaphors alluding to aspects
of Tasawwuf or to experiences encountered on the Sufi path.
In this way, Sufis bring paradise into this life or, conversely,
they raise up to paradise an aspect of this life. An example
of such a metaphorical usage is expressed by the Persian poet
Hafiz, who has written perhaps the best known couplet using
the term “the most exalted paradise” (khuld-i
barin):
Rawda-yi khuld-i barin khalvat-i darvishanast
Maya-yi muhtashimi khalvat-i darvishanast
The garden of the most exalted paradise is the retreat
of solitude of the dervish.
The substance of magnificence is the retreat of solitude
of the dervish.
Ecstasy and “finding” (wajd)
Literally, the word wajd means “finding,”
but for the Sufis it also means a moment of ecstasy in which
one experiences an unveiling – and hence a “finding”
- of some aspect of God’s reality. Ruzbihan (d. 606/1209)
defined wajd as, “The heart’s perceiving
the sweetness of contact with the light of “eternality
before time” (azaliyat), the purity of witnessing,
and the delight of the [Divine] address. Wajd is
often portrayed as the intermediary stage of a three-stage
process consisting of tawajud, wajd, and
wujud. Qushayri defines tawajud as “willfully
seeking to have wajd; one in this state does not
actually possess true wajd.” Concerning wajd
itself, Qushayri wrote, “Wajd is that which
encounters your heart, entering [it and coming] over you,
without will or effort on your part.” Abu al-Husayn
al-Nuri stated, “For twenty years I have gone between
wajd (ecstatic finding) and faqd (loss).
Namely, when I find my Lord, I lose my heart; and when I find
my heart, I lose my Lord.” Qushayri defined the third
stage, wujud, as being that which occurs “after
one progresses beyond wajd;” [it is truly realized
only] “after the cessation of human qualities (khumud
al-bashariya), because human qualities cannot remain
present during the manifestation of the sovereignty of the
Truth (sultan al-haqiqa).” A succinct summary
of each of these three stages was expressed by Qushayri’s
shaykh and father-in-law, Abu ‘Ali al-Daqqaq: “Tawajud
necessitates the rebuking of the servant; wajd necessitates
the drowning of the servant; and wujud necessitates
the annihilation of the servant.” Hence, as one advances
from tawajud to wajd and wujud,
one experiences a progressive dissolution of one’s egocentricity
and a surrendering of one’s identification with one’s
self.
Wearers of Wool (suf pushan)
In Persian the literal meaning of the word sufi
would be translated as “suf push” (wearer
of wool). Hence the phrase in the poem “wearer of wool”
is synonymous with Sufi. It is generally agreed that the first
Sufis were pious, ascetic Muslims who were called Sufis because
they wore clothes of coarse wool (suf) rather than
more refined garments. Some scholars have pointed to a Christian
influence upon this practice. Nevertheless, these early Sufi
ascetics were following the example of the Prophet (pbuh),
who (as reported by Ibn Sa’d [d. 230/845] through reliable
transmitters) was known to wear woollen garments. Moreover,
the great hadith scholar Bayhaqi (d. 458/1066), in his Shu’ab
al-iman, includes numerous reports about the virtues
of wearing suf. In one report the Prophet (pbuh)
states “You should wear clothes of wool (suf).
[In so doing,] you will find the sweetness of faith in your
hearts.” In spite of the criticism leveled against this
and other reports that the Prophet (pbuh)
wore wool, the isnad of Ibn Sa’d’s report
mentioned above was not criticised and appears to be flawless.
Hence in wearing wool the Sufis were not departing from the
record of the sunna of the Prophet (pbuh).
Taste (dhawq)
Generally, one’s spiritual proclivity or capacity is
referred to by the term “taste” (dhawq).
More specifically, Qushayri (d. 465/1072) hierarchically defined
dhawq (tasting) along with shurb (drinking),
and a less commonly used term riyy (being quenched).
He stated,
These terms denote the fruits of ‘theophany’
(tajalli), the results of unveilings (kushufat),
and the appearances of inrushes (waridat) that
they [meaning the Sufis] experience. The first of these
is ‘tasting,’ then, ‘drinking,’
and then ‘being quenched.’ One who is characterized
by dhawq (tasting) tries to be intoxicated (mutasakir).
One who is characterized by shurb (drinking) is
intoxicated (sakran). And one who is characterized
by riyy (being quenched) is sober (sah).
The sense of the term “taste” in the poem “What
is Tasawwuf?” seems to have both the general meaning
and the more specifically Sufi sense as noted by Qushayri.
The general meaning is conveyed in the expressions the “taste
for religion,” where the sense is that the Sufis’
“appreciation” for religion is the basis for their
ecstasy. The more specific meaning of which Qushayri speaks
is alluded to in the poet’s linking together these two
hierarchical states of consciousness (“taste”
and ecstasy”). The poet states that “ecstasy”
is derived from “taste,” implying that Sufi ecstasy
only comes about after a firm foundation in the appreciation
of and commitment to following the religion (namely Islam).
Hence the poet says, “I have heard that the ecstasy
of the wearers of wool (suf) comes from finding the
taste for religion".
Tasawwuf is nothing but shari‘at
A problem that arises in the final couplet of “What
is Tasawwuf?” is that in equating Tasawwuf and shari’a,
the poet brings up and then resolves an apparent tension between
Tasawwuf and shari’a. Such a tension, however, exists
only to the degree that one defines these two terms as being
mutually exclusive. While various extremists persist in excluding
one from the other, we do have many inclusive statements -
such as that of the poet of “What is Tasawwuf?”
– in which Tasawwuf and shari’a are interwoven,
similarly defined, or equated. Qushayri (d. 465/1074), for
example, defined “shari’a” as “assiduous
observance of servanthood.” Defining Tasawwuf in a comparable
fashion, Abu al-Hasan al-Shudhili (d. 656/1258) stated: “Tasawwuf
is training the self (nafs) through servanthood and
subjecting it to the commands (ahkam) of Lordship.”
Supporting the close relationship between Tasawwuf and shari‘a,
the Sufi Abu Yazid al-Bistami (d. 260/874) asserted that observing
the shari‘a was a touchstone for judging a person’s
spiritual degree: “Were you to see a man who performs
miracles such that he ascends into the air, do not be deceived
by him. Instead, observe how well he is following the Divine
commands, abstaining from what is prohibited, keeping within
the limits set by God, and observing the shari‘a.”
Similarly, Abu al-Husayn al-Warraq (d. before 320/932), asserted
the futility of trying to reach God without conforming one’s
actions to shari‘a and the sunna: “A servant will
only reach Allah through Allah and by being in harmony with
his loved one [the Prophet (pbuh)]
through his laws (shari’a). And whoever believes
that he can follow a path without emulating (al-iqtida)
[the Prophet (pbuh)] will become lost,
on account of imagining that he is being guided.” Undoubtedly,
for all but a minority of Sufis throughout history, carefully
observing the shari’a has been a crucial and on-going
component of their spiritual practice.
One way of understanding the interrelationship of Tasawwuf
and shari’a was expressed by the Kubrawi Sufi, Najm
al-Din Razi (d. 654/1256). Using the term tariqa
(path) to denote Tasawwuf – as Sufis commonly do –
he clarified its relationship to shari’a: “The
shari’at has an outer (zahiri) and an inner
(batini) aspect. Its outer aspect consists of bodily
deeds… The inner aspect of the shari’at consists
of deeds of the heart (qalbi), of the inner mystery
(sirri), and of the spirit (ruhi) and is
called the tariqat.” Hence, for Razi, the tariqa
(or Tasawwuf) is not separate from shari‘a, it is, rather,
its inner dimension. In summary, it should be clear, then,
that in spite of extremist views that see Tasawwuf and shari’a
as mutually exclusive, the author of “What is Tasawwuf?”
– like most Sufis – bridges the false dichotomy
between Tasawwuf and shari‘a.
Conclusion
The poem “What is Tasawwuf?” provides answers
to a question that has perplexed people since the term first
began to be used, over 1200 years ago. Its answers to this
question involve technical terms referring to many of the
key concepts of Tasawwuf (or Sufism, as it is commonly called
today). In this commentary we have not discussed the more
obvious phrases and answers expressed by the poet, phrases
such as “faith” (iman) and “the
affirmation of unity” (tawhid). The terms that
we have addressed are the following: good character (akhlaq),
awareness of God (ihsan), love (‘ishq),
affection (mahabba), the heart attaining tranquillity
(itminan-i qalb), concentrating one’s mind
(jam’i khatir), the religion of Ahmad (din-i
Ahmad) (pbuh), contemplation (fikr),
certainty (yaqin), the most exalted paradise (khuld-i
barin), ecstasy (wajd), wearers of wool (suf
pushan), taste (dhawq), and the close relationship
between Tasawwuf and shari’a. From this study, it should
be evident that there are numerous dimensions of Tasawwuf,
including actions in the world, consciousness of God, spiritual
states and practices, and shari’a. And nothing more
– nor less.
................................
(From Sufi Illuminations,
Vol 1, August 1996)
A. A. Godlas, Ph.D. is Associate Professor, University of
Georgia
|